Jun. 09, 2010 - Issue #764: Hot Summer Guide 2010
News Roundup
The People’s Health Care
In January, when the Advisory Committee on Health recommended the introduction of a new Alberta Health Act, Health and Wellness Minister Gene Zwozdesky appointed Edmonton Rutherford MLA Fred Horne to lead a public consultation process and report back to him by September 30th.
To that end, the committee, invited a number of organizations to provide written submissions and participate in consultations about the new Act. Last month, Mr. Horne announced that the province's 12 local Health Advisory Councils will host workshops in their respective areas throughout the month of June. Mr. Horne intends to submit a written report to the Premier by September 30th.
Unfortunately, the online survey, launched at the end of April, appears to have attracted little attention. To date, only 490 surveys have been completed. David Eggen, the Friends of Medicare's Executive Director believes this is because Albertans do not believe this is a legitimate process. "The public care very much about health care," says Eggen. He says the government's survey contains leading questions and the language used makes it quite clear the direction it wants to go in health care delivery.
His group, upon learning the government's public consultation process was going to be an invitation-only affair, decided to hold their own public meetings to discuss the proposed health legislation. He says meetings held last week in Lethbridge and Medicine Hat, and this week in Camrose were very well attended.
Eggen expects large turnouts when the Friends of Medicare hosts a public meeting in Edmonton next Tuesday and, later this month, in Hinton, Grande Prairie, Peace River and Red Deer. "People want to have an open and honest debate without the message being controlled," he says.
A U of A think tank is calling for the whole idea to be scrapped. In "The New Alberta Health Act: Risks and Opportunities," released last week, the Parkland Institute's Research Director Diana Gibson and co-author Colleen Fuller conclude that any potential benefits of the proposed legislation are easily outweighed by the substantial risks involved. Their research suggests that there is every indication that the government intends to use the new Act to expand and entrench the role of for-profit delivery in health care, which could have implications right across the country.
More stories in front »
vueweekly.com comments: powered by DisqusPrivacy Policy:
Vue respects your privacy. We will not forward your personal information to any other organization except as required by law, and will use your e-mail address only to respond to your comments. We reserve the right to edit and remove comments for length, clarity and/or if they are illegal or inappropriate. Your email address is never shown to visitors to vueweekly.com. Read the whole policy at: http://vueweekly.com/privacy
Comments policy
Comments go online directly without first being seen or reviewed by editors at Vue. Don't personally attack people, don't be defamatory, don't be spam-atory, don't hawk your band, don't pretend to be someone else, be clear, be on topic, be nice. Read our extended comments policy here. »
We use Disqus for our comments system. What's that all about?
We found that managing the comment community at Vue was easier to do with a system like Disqus. If this isn't straightforward to you, get help here.