GFA 2013-upper right

May. 23, 2012 - Issue #866: Little Elephants

Share |

Dune

{image_caption}

Based on the best-selling sci-fi novel ever (published in 1965) and released in 1984 after 13 years of development hell (including Alejandro Jodorowsky's planned version, starring Salvador Dalí as the Emperor), after it was forced by Universal and financial backers to be cut from 180 minutes to 135, the epic struggle to get Dune made is bizarre enough. With its added voiceovers (spoken and thought), some clunky F/X (boxy shields protecting knife-fighters), and impossible-for-a-non-Dune-reader-to-follow plot, no wonder David Lynch still won't discuss his first and only foray into genre moviemaking.

The drug on the planet Dune, which fuels time-folding intergalactic travel, lengthens life, and "expands consciousness," is melange. The story itself, though, is a curious mélange of environmentalism (a resource war), '60s trippiness, Christianity (a Messiah's prophesied; melange is a spice, like myrrh), Arab references (a Dune priestess talks of a "ji'had") and Zen notions of mental will. Probably the only way anyone could've worked all that, plus the complex power-struggles on four planets, into a proper adaptation was if they'd time-travelled ahead 25 years and had HBO bankroll a Game of Thrones-like miniseries.

What we get, at best, are enthralling shots: some wondrously rococo and Gaudí-like sets; flashes of steampunk (a whirring fight-machine); eerie aerial pans over the desert. At worst, most scenes seem out of a stilted chamber-drama, with backstory-burdened dialogue and stiff lines. A soporific languor often takes hold. Certain moments just come off as kitschy (a poison-gas tooth is an assassination device out of C-grade James Bond). At least the punkish depravity of the Eastern Bloc-like Harkonnens (including Sting, wearing leather and a codpiece) undercuts the movie's super-seriousness. But it's hard to disagree with critic Robin Wood that the scene where Baron Harkonnen (his oozing lesions making him like a dying AIDS patient) bloodsucks a young man is anything less than "obscenely homophobic." The script's emphasis on women as concubines and "no woman-child" able to withstand the pain that Christ-like Paul Atreides (Kyle MacLachlan) endures makes 10191 AD seem pointlessly regressive. But then, that's the movie's problem, too—for every visual that's fantastically captivating, there's a plot point or line of dialogue that time-folds us backward, right out of the action.

Fri, May 25 (11 pm)
Directed by David Lynch
Metro Cinema at The Garneau
Originally released: 1984
vueweekly.com comments: powered by Disqus
Comments policy

Comments go online directly without first being seen or reviewed by editors at Vue. Don't personally attack people, don't be defamatory, don't be spam-atory, don't hawk your band, don't pretend to be someone else, be clear, be on topic, be nice. Read our extended comments policy here. »

We use Disqus for our comments system. What's that all about?

We found that managing the comment community at Vue was easier to do with a system like Disqus. If this isn't straightforward to you, get help here.

Privacy Policy:

Vue respects your privacy. We will not forward your personal information to any other organization except as required by law, and will use your e-mail address only to respond to your comments. We reserve the right to edit and remove comments for length, clarity and/or if they are illegal or inappropriate. Your email address is never shown to visitors to vueweekly.com. Read the whole policy at: http://vueweekly.com/privacy

↑ Up to story | ↑ Up to comments