Back-to-school blues :: Front :: VUE Weekly

Sep. 09, 2009 - Issue #725: Sex in the City 2009

Share |

Issues

Back-to-school blues

Stories from teachers, parents reveal serious problems with the education system in Alberta

| Commenting on this story is closed.

Talk to any parent or teacher for long enough this time of year, and you're bound to eventually start hearing back-to-school stories. Whether it's battles over shopping for school supplies, stress over just the right outfit for the first day back, or simply excited kids bouncing off the walls in the last week of holidays, everyone has their story.

My family's story this year, however, has been more punctuated by shock and frustration than ever before. My 12 year-old twins last week started Grade 7 French immersion at McKernan School, but our back-to-school story actually started the week before. While in the midst of spending hundreds of dollars to purchase all of the supplies on the list provided by the school, and spending hundreds more on new clothes and shoes that we know will no longer fit come December, we received the annual notice from the school outlining what our fees will be for this year.

At the bottom of each fee sheet in bolded font was the number $560. My brain could simply not process how in a province where education is still supposed to be public, universal and free, I was being asked to cut a cheque for $1120 so my kids could go to school.

One of the first questions that ran through my mind upon seeing the total was, "What happens to parents who simply cannot afford to pay the fees?" The answer, luckily, was written in large letters at the bottom of the fee schedule: "All fees must be paid in full by September 30 unless other arrangements have been made." In other words, if you cannot afford the fees, it is up to you to suck up your pride and beg the school to give you a break, and even then the best you can expect is to be put on some sort of monthly payment plan for the fees.

I was still not entirely over the shock of the fees when, after the first day of school, my partner and I sat down to ask our kids about their new class and teacher. The first thing out of their mouths was concern about the fact that there are 37 students in their class. That's not just their homeroom class; they will travel with those same 37 students to all of their core subjects. Anyone who has ever spent any time with a 12-year-old knows full well the impossibility of not only keeping 37 of them in control, but also of being able to collectively teach them something.

There's a reason that the Alberta Learning Commission recommended a maximum class size for junior high of 25 students—having more than that does damage to both the students and the teacher.

A line of angry and concerned parents immediately formed outside the principal's office at the school, but these parents' concerns were met
with the response that nothing could be done, and with vague platitudes about how bright the students were and how good the teachers were and that it should not be a problem. Even if extra funding was found, explained the principal, the priority would be to split up the kindergarten class at the school—which currently has 30 students—not the Grade 7 class.

In my frustration, I began asking other parents and teachers for their back-to-school stories, and I quickly discovered that ours is not an isolated or extreme case. I heard from a high school English teacher who currently has 38 students in her class, and only 35 desks. I heard from the parent of a special needs student who had to fight up the entire bureaucracy all the way to the superintendent to secure a classroom aid for his child. And the parent in southern Alberta who was told, essentially, that the only acceptable diagnosis and treatment for her child was ADHD and medications, and subsequently had to spend thousands of dollars outside the school system to obtain specialized support for her child's severe reading disability. Or the teacher in Edmonton who actually had an administrator go in and arbitrarily alter her marks after she had submitted them.

The stories go on and on, but they give a very clear sense of a system that is broken and badly in need of repair. For all of the government's rhetoric about prioritizing the education of children, the reality is very different. It has been six years since the Alberta Commission on Learning reported back to the government with a series of recommendations on kindergarten, funding, class size and numerous other issues, and the reality is that all of those recommendations continue to gather dust on the shelves.

At the same time the provincial government has just undergone a province-wide "conversation" with Albertans about what our education system will look like in the future. The problem, however, is that the minister made it very clear that there was to be no discussion at all in this "conversation" about what the system looks like today. The government knows that the system is in disarray, and they are purposefully choosing to look the other way.

The truly sad and frustrating part is that things are in the process of getting worse. As bad as things are today, Alberta Education announced the week before school started that they would be clawing back some $44 million in accumulated surpluses from school boards around the province. That same week he asked all school boards in Alberta to "trim" one percent from their operating budgets for the 2009 – 2010 school year, which would mean another $56 million in cuts.

Now Education Minister David Hancock has issued notice to school boards that, there will be even bigger budget cuts coming next year. In other words, as bad as things are today—and have been for the last five years—they are about to get much, much worse. Teachers will lose jobs, class sizes will continue to grow, supports for special needs students will disappear, school fees will increase exponentially, infrastructure will literally crumble and our children's education will suffer greatly as a result.

The rationale from the government, of course, is the same as that given to me by my kids' principal—we have no options, we have no money. This may be true for the principal but it certainly isn't for the provincial government. This is, after all, the same government that has managed to find $2 billion for carbon capture and storage, over $5 billion in royalty breaks to the oil and gas industry and over $22 million in severance payouts for fired health managers. It's not about a lack of money, it's about priorities.

And we as parents make it easier for them to ignore the needs of the education system because we don't complain—we suck it up and do what's necessary for our kids to succeed despite the system. Teachers do likewise—suck it up and do whatever it takes to educate and nurture despite a system that seems designed to keep that from happening. When we do complain and speak up as parents and teachers, we tend to make targets out of each other, rather than out of the government that is ultimately responsible for this mess.

If we truly value education, and truly value our children's well-being, then it's time to stand up and be heard. Call your school board reps. Call your MLA. Call Ed Stelmach and Dave Hancock. Organize other concerned parents at your children's school. Rally in front of their offices, or at the legislature. Take action and demand that our education system be prioritized—with funding and with a structure that works. If we don't, then we stand to lose what little is left of our public education system in this province. V

Ricardo Acuña is executive director of the Parkland Institute, a non-partisan public policy research institute housed at the University of Alberta. 

New comments for this entry have been turned off and any existing ones are hidden. We apologize for any inconvenience.